Is beauty/handsome an advantage at work?
Are beautiful and handsome people really always one step ahead? In general, it is common to think that beauty and handsomeness are advantageous to a person. So how far can this go?
“Beauty is good” (or not?)
The idea that “beauty is good” is a stereotypical idea that has taken hold in people’s minds.
People with this mindset (and you can get it without knowing it) see people who meet their beauty standards one step ahead of others.
Here, standards change with time and society, giving no place to the distinction between men and women.
In other words, the factors that society considers beautiful, such as the facial features and the thinness of the waist. Women with different elements can also enter this title. men as well.
In this way of thinking, beautiful people are automatically expected to be successful and healthy.
Similarly, people with this mindset expect beauty standards to be adhered to by people who know they are healthy and successful without having to look at their faces (either directly or indirectly). Therefore, you may be under pressure without even realizing it.
beauty here
According to Webtekno news, a study signed by psychology professor Madeleine Heilmann asked college students to look at and evaluate resumes given to them by fresh graduates.
Predictably, students who rated gender according to occupations that society sees as male and female rated the beautiful (pictured) person’s resume highly.
A man rated as beautiful was considered suitable for both professions. But in jobs that were supposedly reserved for women, beautiful women had an advantage.
The reason is simple. It was believed that women who looked beautiful had more feminine features and were therefore unsuitable for jobs requiring masculinity.Note that this is her 1979 study. .
So why can’t we accept this as true? Because this study was conducted in a laboratory, the people observed knew the results of this experiment, so it may have been particularly fair.
Due to this influence, events can negatively affect beautiful people. To confirm this, we looked at the research of psychology professor Komilla Shahani Denning.
In the aforementioned study, Shahani. They work with observers to deal with attractive, unattractive, and average employees and ask them to discipline them.
As a result, beautiful people are held more accountable when they make mistakes. To an unattractive person, these mistakes are simply viewed as “bad luck.” In other words, it can be said that the effect described here is reversed.
Is beauty at work good or bad?
Shahani’s data from various studies confirms that good people have an advantage in the workplace.
When we look at the idea that beauty is an animal influence, we see that such effective results do not come from different studies. At least not when it comes to recruitment.
Finally, what we can discuss:
What methods can employers use to ensure that candidates are not biased about beauty when selecting recruiters?
Let’s take a look at John E. Stewart’s 1980 research paper. This focuses on the influence of attractiveness on judgment.
In the study here, observers assessed the attractiveness of defendants by attending specific hearings.
A study of 67 defendants and their sentences with varying attractiveness values found that attractive defendants were given shorter sentences than others.
Of course, gender can also play a role in this situation.
A 2009 study by Angela Ahola and Åke Hellström sheds light on this issue. In this study, photographs of people with varying degrees of beauty and of crimes that may have been committed are given to an observed group.
As a result, it can be seen that attitudes toward women have become somewhat softer. But let me point out that this is only for beautiful women.
Take Casey Anthony’s case for example.
As we know in education your looks don’t matter. At least we know that beautiful/handsome people don’t fill their paperwork fast.
However, according to some studies, “expectations” from beautiful people are higher than from others.
Don’t think of it as putting pressure on them. This is where the idea of ”should be smart, must be smart” is born. But this is not noticeable.
In this context, teachers may automatically expect better results from relatively beautiful students.
There are also situations where students see a bright future and think they can develop qualities such as leadership.
This expectation arouses special interest in those students and allows them to be more successful. But are they successful because they are beautiful or handsome? I can’t tell you, but science leaves no room for stereotypes.
For this reason, much research has been done on whether actual success (rather than external expectations) has anything to do with beauty.
Dorian G. Mitchem’s work shows that handsome people are automatically expected to do well.
When it comes to hard data, Mitchem, along with many others, show that beauty and academic success are not related.
Regularity, rigor and diligence have been found to be the closest factors to academic success.
So what does all of this mean when you look at research on education?
We said that beauty misleads people when predicting academic success.
Of course, getting out of this situation is not so easy. You need controlled objectivity.
What exactly is it that attracts you to your face?
If two people offer the same thing in a job interview, and one looks sleepy and looks less clean than the other, that person might appear inferior in the illusion of beauty. I can’t.
More importantly, these faces almost conform to beauty standards, as a well-groomed and sleepless face is believed to indicate health and order.
Is a beautiful face really important for health and organization?
S. Michael Kalick of the University of Massachusetts Department of Psychology focused on this in one of his studies.
As a result of his research, he found that such estimates based on people’s appearance actually preceded “actual” health estimates.
Of course, let’s open the brackets here and point out that we’re excluding unconscious facial expressions and other facial expressions that can change over time. Become.
This study included healthy individuals who were not ill, and estimates were made accordingly.
This means that when you go to an interview that meets all your needs, you may not get the job just because your looks don’t match the beauty requirements of the era.
So at this point the norm is formed and the need for that work moves beyond the field of view, even if no one notices it.
